ARMCHAIR AMERICAN: A VIEW FROM THE CENTER
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Me
  • Subscribe
Picture

Time to Change the California Recall Laws?

10/2/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
The ability to recall elected officials has been part of the California Constitution since 1911. Though seldom used, it is a provision which holds politicians accountable to the voters for misdeeds while in office. On September 14, 2021 Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom defeated a recall election put in motion by a group of Republicans upset principally for his handling of the coronavirus pandemic.  This partisan attack on a popular governor cost the taxpayers over $276 million, leaving many Californians rethinking the whole process. How does the recall process work, what changes, if any, should be made, and how would those changes take place?
​
The Recall Law: Recall gives voters the power to remove any elected state officer, and most elected local officers, before the expiration of their term. Any registered voter may initiate a recall as long as they are qualified to vote for the office of the officer they seek to recall. A recall can be initiated for any reason and the process is fairly simple. There are some minor differences between recalling a state vs local officer, so for the sake of simplicity I will stick to the process for recalling a governor. A complete description of the recall process in California can be found at the following link,  https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/recalls/recall-procedures-guide.pdf. 
Picture
​The recall begins with the preparation of a “notice of intent to recall petition”. This petition is served to the officer being recalled and filed with the Secretary of State. The notice of intention document must be published in a widely circulated publication. Proof of the publication, along with two copies of the proposed recall petition are then filed with the Secretary of State for review. Once approved, the recall petition may be circulated for signature by registered voters.

Petitions for the recall of the governor must be signed by at least 12% of the number of voters who voted in the last election for governor, and must include at least 1% of the voters who voted in the previous election from at least five different counties. This last provision prevents large counties from unilaterally initiating recall elections. The sponsors of the recall petition have 160 days to collect the required number of signatures and have them validated by the Registrar of Voters in each county where signatories reside. Once this process is complete the recall petition is certified by the Secretary of State. The Governor must then publish a notice for the holding of the recall election. 
Picture
​The Recall Ballot: In the latest recall election the ballot consisted of two parts. The first asked the following yes or no question: “Shall Gavin Newsom be recalled (removed) from the office of Governor?” The second part listed all qualified replacement candidates. You could vote for one of these candidates or provide a write-in candidate. The officer being recalled, in this case Newsom, is unable to run as a replacement candidate.
​
If a majority of the votes on the recall question are “Yes”, the Governor is removed from office. The replacement candidate receiving the highest number of votes is elected to serve out the remainder of the Governor’s term. 
Picture
How to Qualify as a Replacement Candidate: A replacement candidate must be a California registered voter and file the required paperwork at least 59 days before the scheduled recall election. The paperwork includes nomination papers with a minimum of 65 valid signatures. The paperwork is filed with the county elections official along with a filing fee. In the latest recall election, the filing fee was   $4, 194.94. In lieu of the filing fee, a candidate could submit a minimum of 7,000 signatures. If the 7,000-signature threshold was not reached, the filing fee could be reduced on a prorated basis based on the actual number of valid signatures collected. 

​Flaws in the Recall Law:
  1. It is too easy to trigger a recall election in California, making it a partisan tool to damage a political party or opponent. A recall election can be triggered for any reason, legitimate or not, and approved by a small percentage of the electorate.
  2. If a recall election is successful, the replacement candidate can win with fewer votes than the candidate they are replacing. The officer being recalled can stay in office if they win more than 50% of the total votes cast. But if they don’t reach that threshold they can be replaced by a candidate with a smaller percentage of the total votes. In a large pool of replacement candidates, a winner could emerge who won only a small percentage of the total votes, perhaps 10-15%. That doesn’t seem very democratic, but it is legal in California.  
Picture
​Solutions to the Recall Law:
  1. Increase the number of required signatures on the recall petition from 12% to 20% or more of the number of voters who participated in the previous election.
  2. Most states allow recall elections to take place only under certain circumstances. These include being convicted of a crime while in office, misconduct, or failure to perform the duties of the office. In California an official can be recalled for any reason, which leaves the process open to political chicanery. Recall elections should only be permitted under cases of malfeasance, criminal activity, or dereliction of duty.
  3. When a governor is recalled in most states, the lieutenant governor completes the term. This should be the case in California. Short of this, the governor should be able to run against the other candidates listed in part 2 of the recall ballot.
  4. If the recall succeeds but no replacement candidate receives more than 50% of the total votes, then a runoff election should be held with the top two vote getters. 
Picture
Changing the California Constitution:  An amendment to the state constitution may be placed on the ballot by either a two-thirds vote in the California State Legislature or signatures equal to 8% of the votes cast in the previous gubernatorial election. The amendment is passed if it receives over 50% of the votes in a state-wide election.  

The time has come to modify the way that recall elections are initiated and carried out in California. It is far too costly, and the process is anything but democratic. There are moves afoot in the private sector and in the state capitol to push through reforms. Let’s adopt some common-sense reforms that are already in place in most states across the nation.   

​ 
If you enjoy reading this type of commentary please subscribe to my blog and tell a friend. You will receive an email notification when new blogs are posted. The email will come from the site’s email: armchairamerican1776 @gmail.com.
Thanks,
Armchair American


0 Comments

    Author

    The Armchair American.

    Picture

    Archives

    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020

    Categories

    All
    14th Amendment
    1st Amendment
    2020 Presidential Election
    2021
    2024 Election
    2024 Presidential Primary
    2nd Amendment
    4th Of July
    Afghanistan War
    American Flag
    American Rescue Plan
    August 2023
    Black Lives Matter
    Border
    Border Politics
    California Recall
    Camino De Santiago
    Cancel Culture
    Capitol Riot
    Character
    China
    Chris Christie
    Christianity
    Clarence Thomas
    Cluster Bombs
    Concord And Lexington
    Confederate Statues
    Congress
    COVID Pandemic
    COVID Tests
    Crime
    Crossfire Hurricane
    Debt Ceiling
    Democratic Convention
    Donald Trump
    Durham Report
    Electoral College
    Extremism
    FaceMasks
    Father Serra
    FBI
    Filibuster
    Guns In America
    Hilliary Clinton
    Horowitz Report
    House Of Representatives
    Immigration
    Impeachment Inquiry
    Independents
    IRS
    James Comey
    January 6th Committee
    J.D. Vance
    Joe Biden
    Kamala Harris
    Kevin McCarthy
    Mar-a-Lago
    Matt Gaetz
    Midterm Elections
    Mike Pence
    Militias
    Mitch McConnell
    Moore V. Harper
    Mueller Report
    NATO
    Nikki Haley
    NRA
    Olympics
    Open Primaries
    Politics
    Presidential Leadership
    Presidential Pardon
    Presidential Power
    Presidential Records
    Prop 47
    Public Health
    Putin
    QAnon
    Rank Choice Voting
    Republican Convention
    Revolutionary War
    Robinhood
    Ron DeSantis
    Russia
    Russia Probe
    Sanewashing
    Senate Disfunction
    Smash And Grab Roberries
    Socialism
    Supreme Court
    Swift Boating
    Taxes
    Terrorism
    Third-Party Candidates
    Tim Walz
    Title 42
    Trump
    Trump Indicted
    Trumpism
    Tucker Carlson
    UAP
    UFOs
    Ukraine
    Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
    Updates
    Vaccine Boosters
    Vaccines
    Voting
    Voting Rights
    VP Debate
    Zelensky

    RSS Feed

Subscribe to Blog
Contact me at [email protected]
Site powered by Weebly. Managed by Bluehost
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About Me
  • Subscribe